From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Jan 19 2006 - 09:39:26 PST
Plots from Mike for today's discussion.
for reference, the TWiki page is
http://hstclustersn.lbl.gov:8081/twiki/bin/view/Main/ProposalCycle15
-Tony
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Mike Gladders <gladders@ociw.edu>
> Date: January 19, 2006 12:42:57 AM PST
> To: saul@lbl.gov
> Cc: ALSpadafora@lbl.gov
> Subject: Plots for telecon
>
> Hi Saul(and Tony):
>
> Two plots are attached. These show the distribution of
> 850LP-K_short color for the two RCS clusters for which we have a)
> complete
> HST z-band data, and b) deep (multi-hour sub 0.5 arcsec with 8m class
> telescope) K_short imaging. The plots show the distribution of colors
> normalised to the cluster red-sequence, for only galaxies
> morphologically
> consistent with being E-gals. These include a fit which attempts
> (fairly
> sucessfully I think) to untangle the cluster and file constributions.
>
> I'd like to add a second x-axis to thes plots which shows the
> translation of color to redshift - I haven't doen the calcs yet as I
> have
> been trying to grind this out in time for tommorrow's telecon. but easy
> enough to do, given time!
>
> Basically these show similar results to what Marc P has shown -
> and are admittedly at this point somewhat cruder - with the two
> advantages
> that this has z-K color (better at untangling the true background E's
> from
> the cluster, and there don't appear to be many!) and that it is with
> our
> HST data from this cycle (so good to show that we are working with the
> data)...
>
> Anyway, I am wiped after putting in the time to get this done,
> so I am not sure I can make the telecon myself ; I'll try to make sure
> there is at least one RCS person on the line though, and will atempt to
> dial in from home if I can get home and to sleep soon...
>
> Tony, could you please make these plots available via the webpage? I
> ahve
> forgotten how and its too late and my brains too dead to figure it out.
> Thanks!
>
> Mike
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 19 2006 - 09:40:39 PST