Re: latest abstract

From: Eric Linder (evlinder@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri Jan 27 2006 - 14:26:32 PST

Next message: Saul Perlmutter: "Here's the proposal we submitted (with its official proposal number)."

Previous message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: latest abstract"
In reply to: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: latest abstract"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think it is fair to stand as written. While z>1 is in the
deceleration epoch, it is probing the transition from deceleration to
acceleration: since distances give an integral relation, one needs to
go to higher redshifts to see clearly the effects from lower redshifts.

-Eric

On Jan 27, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Vitaliy Fadeyev wrote:

> - 1st paragraph, "... for those SNe at z >= 1, where the transition
> from deceleration to acceleration can be studied". The sentence
> looks confused, because the transition actually happens
> at lower redshifts. I would say "... for those SNe at z >= 1,
> deep in the regime of deceleration."

Next message: Saul Perlmutter: "Here's the proposal we submitted (with its official proposal number)."
Previous message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: latest abstract"
In reply to: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "Re: latest abstract"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 27 2006 - 14:26:23 PST