Re: Reworked strong lens section

From: Eric Linder (EVLinder@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Jan 26 2006 - 17:09:34 PST

  • Next message: Henk Hoekstra: "Re: Reworked strong lens section"

    Hi Henk and Joe,

    I've been asked to work with the two of you to strengthen (within a
    confined space) the weak/strong lensing section and surrounding
    text. I attach my version of what I think incorporates (with a
    ruthless hand for space constraints) your emails of this afternoon.
    Henk should insert what he regards as further crucial points into the
    weak lensing section, which may have been overly shortened. I've
    tried to keep Joe's main strong lensing points in.

    Feel free to edit the .tex, or just send me separate short edits if
    we're close to convergence.

    Cheers,
    Eric

    
    On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Joseph Hennawi wrote:

    > I agree that the weak lensing should not be compressed, but I think
    > the strong lensing science is compelling

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 26 2006 - 17:09:30 PST