Re: parallel orbits

From: Daniel Stern (stern@thisvi.jpl.nasa.gov)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2007 - 14:42:16 PST

Next message: Tony Spadafora: "new version of HST proposal posted"

Previous message: Kyle Dawson: "parallel orbits"
In reply to: Kyle Dawson: "parallel orbits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

for the Bootes clusters, parallels could be quite valuable as there are a
wide range of follow-up programs going on in that field. i'm not sure
they'd be as valuable for the other clusters.

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Kyle Dawson wrote:

> Hi All,
> We will be asking for some NICMOS orbits to schedule as target of
> oppurtunity for high z SNe (probably around 20 orbits?). These NICMOS
> visits leave the option of scheduling parallel observations with ACS,
> effectively sampling a random area of sky offset from the SN target by
> about 8 arcminutes. We did not schedule any parallel observations in
> cycle 14, does anyone have a strong opinion that we should ask for these
> parallels in the current proposal? At LBL, we prefer not to request
> parallels as it simplifies observations and keeps the proposal concise.
>
> -Kyle
>

Next message: Tony Spadafora: "new version of HST proposal posted"
Previous message: Kyle Dawson: "parallel orbits"
In reply to: Kyle Dawson: "parallel orbits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jan 24 2007 - 14:39:02 PST