From: Arjun Dey (dey@noao.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2007 - 19:46:34 PST
This is a great proposal, folks. I would give it time if i were on the
TAC (which i am not).
Aloha
Arjun
very minor comments:
page 1, para 1, line 11: "... by finding SNe Ia in z>1 cluster
*ellipticals* ... " (rather than clusters)
figure 2 left and right panel - should be larger - the figs are
beautiful, but in the version i read, the labels are a bit too tiny
figure 3, right panel - what is n_{gal} ? need to define for the
illiterati like me.I must admit i am a bit confused by this plot, and
in particular, by the large scatter at low n_gal (assuming n_gal is
what i think it is).
crazy point: is there a significant probability that the lensing
amplification in these fields would significantly increase our
probability of seeing even higher redshift (z > z_cluster) SNe? would
these provide useful constraints (assuming we can detect and measure
them)?
page 6, section on "Supernovae rates..", line 5: 'hostless' -->
`hostless'
On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> Cluster search group,
>
> The working draft of the cycle 16 proposal on
> http://supernova.lbl.gov/HSTclusterSN/proposals/HSTc16/clusters/text/
> (HSTclusterSN/HSTclusterSN)
>
> has Wednesday's reworking of various sections. Comments are welcome.
> There are still embedded internal questions and ?'s in various places.
> Sci Just will need to be cut a little (~11 lines). Some of the figures
> need work. All of the captions and references will need to be checked.
>
> -Tony
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 25 2007 - 19:46:49 PST